Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Dick v. Wiethaupt

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided December 21, 1915Published

Transferred from St. Louis Court of Appeals. The judgment or order of the county court granting a dramshop license at the same term of court at which the petitions of the assessed tax-paying citizens and guardians of minors of the block and municipal township are filed is void. Sec. 7201, R. S. 1909; State ex rel. v. Heege, 37 Mo. App. 338; State ex rel. v. Mitchell, 127 Mo. App. 455; State ex rel. v. Higgins, 84 Mo. App. 531.

1Opinion of the Court

RAILEY, C.

On application of relators, a writ of certiorari ivas issued by the St. Louis Court of *308Appeals in March, 1912, commanding the County Court of St. Louis County, Missouri, to transmit to said Court of Appeals, the record of the proceedings had in the said County Court in the matter of the application of Charles- S. Kinney for a dramshop license. In obedience to said writ, the respondents herein made full return to said Court of Appeals of all such proceedings, including the original papers.

It appears from relator’s written application for said writ of certiorari, that the petition of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. EvansSupreme Court of Missouri · 1884
  2. State ex rel. Reider v. Moniteau County CourtMissouri Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. State ex rel. Campbell v. HeegeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1889
  4. State ex rel. Dick v. WiethauptMissouri Court of Appeals · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API