Legal Opinion
People v. Elizabeth P.
New York Supreme Court
Decided October 25, 2011PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Juan M. Merchan, J.
By notice of motion dated August 12, 2011, Mary Beth Feerick, Esq., of counsel to Mental Hygiene Legal Service (hereinafter MHLS), moves on behalf of the defendant to preclude the New York County District Attorney’s Office from participating in defendant’s upcoming Jackson hearing. (Jackson v Indiana, 406 US 715 [1972].)
A Jackson hearing is scheduled to be held before this court upon the motion of the Office of the Attorney General, on behalf of the Commissioner of the New York State Office of Mental Health (hereinafter OMH) and the Director of Kirby…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Dusky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Jackson v. IndianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- People v. ClaytonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
- People v. MendezNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
- People v. PhillipsNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. Christopher B.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. Christopher B.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012