Rice v. Reich
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilkie, J.
The only issue presented on this appeal is whether, if the purchasers had knowledge of the joint-driveway easement at the time they executed the offer to purchase, they are precluded from raising any objection to the encumbrance and barred from recovering their $1,000 earnest-money payment. We conclude that they are. The case is controlled by Taxman v. McMa-han. In Taxman this court stated:
“Wisconsin early recognized an exception to the foregoing rule, namely, that an easement which is fully known to a purchaser before he makes his contract of purchase, or which is so open, obvious, and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Shepard v. PabstWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
- Drovers' Deposit National Bank v. TichenorWisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
- Klippel v. BorngesserWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
- Taxman v. McMahanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- Lease v. ZarndtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ludke v. EganWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
- Younger v. Rosenow Paper & Supply Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
- Mnuk v. Harmony Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2010
- Don-Rick, Inc. v. QBE AmericasDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2014
- C. R. Stocks, Inc. v. Blakely's Matterhorn, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.