Legal Opinion

Rice v. Reich

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 4, 1971No. 284PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkie, J.

The only issue presented on this appeal is whether, if the purchasers had knowledge of the joint-driveway easement at the time they executed the offer to purchase, they are precluded from raising any objection to the encumbrance and barred from recovering their $1,000 earnest-money payment. We conclude that they are. The case is controlled by Taxman v. McMa-han. In Taxman this court stated:

“Wisconsin early recognized an exception to the foregoing rule, namely, that an easement which is fully known to a purchaser before he makes his contract of purchase, or which is so open, obvious, and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Shepard v. PabstWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Drovers' Deposit National Bank v. TichenorWisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Klippel v. BorngesserWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Taxman v. McMahanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Lease v. ZarndtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ludke v. EganWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Younger v. Rosenow Paper & Supply Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Mnuk v. Harmony Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2010
  4. Don-Rick, Inc. v. QBE AmericasDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2014
  5. C. R. Stocks, Inc. v. Blakely's Matterhorn, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API