Kurlanchick v. Sklamberg
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of Hew York, fourth district, borough of Manhattan, rendered in favor of the defendant.
1Opinion of the CourtLeventritt, J.
The defendant is a wholesale' grocer engaged in business at No. 71 Ludlow street, a main thoroughfare of this city. In front of his premises he had constructed a platform about four inches high and, for aught that the record discloses to the contrary, within the stoop line. For convenience in loading and unloading goods, wagons were backed against the curb and a skid run from the rear of the wagons across the sidewalk to the platform.
On the 20th day of November, 1906, the plaintiff was passing along Ludlow street on her way to market. On arriving at the defendant’s place of business she found…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Callanan v. . GilmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
- Cohen v. . Mayor, Etc., of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Welsh v. . WilsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Murphy v. . LeggettNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
3Cited by1 opinion
- Fleischer v. White Rose Food Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989