Legal Opinion

Brown v. Government Employees Insurance Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 14, 2017No. 524696Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partLynch, J.

We concur in the majority statement, except insofar as the majority has determined that damages for emotional distress are not recoverable on plaintiff’s breach of contract claim. The majority correctly states the governing rule for consequential loss as defined by the Court of Appeals in Panasia Estates, Inc. v Hudson Ins. Co. (10 NY3d 200 [2008]) and Bi-Economy Mkt., Inc. v Harleysville Ins. Co. of N.Y. (10 NY3d 187 [2008]). Those cases involved claims for consequential damages for breach of a commercial property insurance policy and in the context of business interruption insurance…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bi-Economy Market, Inc. v. Harleysville InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. Acquista v. New York Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  3. Panasia Estates, Inc. v. Hudson InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Connolly v. Peerless InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API