Legal Opinion

Braunview Associates v. Unmack

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 31, 1996PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied the motion of respondent, Assessor of the Town of Tonawanda, to dismiss the petition and granted the relief sought therein, directing respondent to accept petitioner’s application for a partial tax exemption pursuant to RPTL 485-b and to make a determination thereon. The relief sought by petitioner is not barred by res judicata. The doctrine of res judicata "is grounded on the premise that once a person has been afforded a full and fair opportunity to litigate a particular issue, that person may not be…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gramatan Home Investors Corp. v. LopezNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Watts v. Swiss Bank Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1970
  3. Miller Manufacturing Co. v. ZeilerNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Schulman Master Ltd. Partnership I v. Town/Village of HarrisonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  5. Sitterly Road Associates v. Board of Assessment ReviewAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. A.P. Wide World Realty v. Town of ClarkstownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. Metroplex Harriman Corp. v. RuscherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API