Legal Opinion
Dias v. Woodrow
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided March 9, 1961PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSpiegel, J.
This is an action of tort in which the plaintiff Evelyn Dias seeks to recover for personal injuries incurred when she fell while leaving a store named “Kramer’s Delicatessen” rented to the defendant Nathan Kramer and located in a building owned by the defendant Sumner Woodrow. Her husband seeks to recover consequential damages resulting from the same injury.
A trial was had in the Superior Court in which the judge allowed the motion for directed verdicts filed by the defendant Woodrow at the conclusion of the evidence. Just prior to the allowance of the defendant Woodrow’s motion for directed…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Donnelly v. LarkinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951
- Shwartz v. FeinbergMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Minkkinen v. NymanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
- Shepard v. Worcester County Institution for SavingsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Leonardo v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1960
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Hopkins v. F. W. Woolworth Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1981
- Schopen v. RandoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962
- Morris v. LodgenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962
- Isenberg v. LushanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
- Nessralla v. Massachusetts Port AuthorityMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1972
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.