Legal Opinion

In Re Joyner

California Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1989No. Crim. 25596Published

1Opinion of the Court

48 Cal.3d 487 (1989)

769 P.2d 967

256 Cal. Rptr. 785

In re ERIC W. JOYNER on Habeas Corpus.

Docket No. Crim. 25596.

Supreme Court of California.

April 3, 1989.

COUNSEL

Donald Specter and Steven Fama for Petitioner.

Manuel E. Nestle as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Petitioner.

John K. Van de Kamp, Attorney General, Steve White, Chief Assistant Attorney General, John H. Sugiyama, Assistant Attorney General, Martin S. Kaye and Robert R. Granucci, Deputy Attorneys General, for Respondent.

OPINION

KAUFMAN, J.

Petitioner Eric W. Joyner was convicted of grand theft (Pen. Code, § 487)[1] and robbery (§ 211), with an…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Moradi-Shalal v. Fireman's Fund Ins. CompaniesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. In Re RojasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  3. In Re AtilesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  4. In Re LawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  5. In Re JoynerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API