Legal Opinion

Japhet v. Pullen

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 30, 1913PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Harris County; Norman G. Kittrell, Judge. Action by Betty Pullen and husband against Ida Japhet and others. From an order fixing the compensation of the guardian ad litem of infant defendants, such infant defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.

Betty Pullen, joined by her husband, brought suit against Ida Japhet in her individual capacity and as independent executrix of the estate of Isadore Japhet, deceased, and as guardian of the estate of the testator’s minor children, also against Dan A. Japhet and Japhet & Co., a corporation, for the recovery of an interest in the property of the estate of the decedent, which she alleged had been appropriated by the defendants, and for a partition of the property of said estate. Ernst, Hilda, Alfred, and Emil Japh-et, the last three named being minors, were made parties defendant to' said suit…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Trustees v. GreenoughSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. STANTON v. Embrey, AdministratorSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Stuart v. BoulwareSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  4. Randall v. . PackardNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  5. Selover v. BryantSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. City of Houston v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
  2. Consolidated Underwriters v. SaxonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
  3. Sheehan v. Southern Pacific CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
  4. Texon Oil & Land Co. of Delaware v. HanszenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  5. Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. StoreyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API