Legal Opinion
Bemis Bro. Bag Co. v. Feidelson
District Court, W.D. Tennessee
Decided January 23, 1936PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, District Judge.
On January 22, IÓ36, Bemis Bro. Bag Company filed in this court its bill of complaint against the parties listed in the above caption, praying injunctive relief against the defendants named from prosecution before the National Labor Relations Board of a complaint made by Local No. 1838, United Textile Workers of America, against the Bemis Bros. Bag Company.
The bill also prays an injunction restraining enforcement against complainant of the National Labor Relations Act, chapter 372, Statutes of United States of America, passed at the First Session of the Seventy-Fourth…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Crowell v. BensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- A. L. A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- United States v. ButlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Duplex Printing Press Co. v. DeeringSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- S. Buchsbaum & Co. v. BemanDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1936
- Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corporation v. MeyersDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1936
- Delaware, L. & W. R. v. SlocumDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1944
- United States v. LewisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1953
- Jamestown Veneer & Plywood Corporation v. BolandDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1936