Legal Opinion

United States ex rel. Angelica v. Hammond

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided November 4, 1938No. Nos. 8792, 8607PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIBLEY, Circuit Judge.

These are appeals from judgments in habeas corpus cases to test warrants of removal to other States for trial on federal offenses. The áppellee moves to dismiss the appeals on the ground that since they were taken the Act of June 29, 1938, has gone into effect, which he urges prevents consideration of them, there being in. the Act no saving of-pending cases. The Act amends 28 U.S.C.A. § 463(a) by inserting a proviso so that it shall read thus:

“In a proceeding in habeas corpus in a district court, or before a district judge, or a circuit judge, the final order shall be…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ex Parte McCardleSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  2. Railroad Co. v. GrantSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  3. Norris v. CrockerSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
  4. Insurance Co. v. RitchieSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  5. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1922

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Thomas J. Roba v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
  2. Rothermel v. FLA. PAROLE & PROBATION COM'NDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  3. Story v. Todd Houston Shipbuilding CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1947
  4. United States ex rel. Dilling v. McDonnellCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1942
  5. United States v. Lawrence Brooks in Re: Lawrence BrooksCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API