Legal Opinion
Oliver & Iverson v. Honeycutt
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided November 19, 2003No. 93A02-0302-EX-132PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SULLIVAN, Judge.
O&I Transport, Inc. ("O&I") appeals from the decision of the full Worker's Compensation Board affirming the single hearing member's decision that Donald Honeycutt was entitled to benefits under to the Worker's Compensation Act. The sole issue O&1 presents for our review is whether the Board properly determined that Honeycutt was an employee of O&1.
We reverse and remand.
O&I is a carrier of products which entered into a contract with Jeff Tiell, who agreed to supply trucks and drivers for O&I's business. On April 24, 2001, Ho-neycutt was employed by Tiell to drive one of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- GKN Co. v. MagnessIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
- Walker v. State, Muscatatuck State Development CenterIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
- Transport Motor Express, Inc. v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1974
- Daniels v. TERMINAL TRANSP. CO., INC.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1954
- Van-Scyoc v. Mid-State PavingIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ag One Co-Op v. ScottIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
- City of Greenwood v. TOWN OF BARGERSVILLEIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
- Carroll v. KampsDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2011
- Ag One Co-Op v. ScottIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009