Wright v. Universal Garage Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtSutton, J.
1. The husband is bound to support and maintain his wife, and his consent to her agency is presumed in all purchases of necessaries suitable to her condition and habits of life, made for the use of herself and the family. Code, § 53-510. This section is based on the theory of the law that a husband is the head of the family and is bound to support and maintain his wife and children. The husband is responsible for all supplies which are necessary for the family, and suitable to their condition in life; and it will be presumed that the wife acts as her husband’s agent in contracting such debts,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Wrightsville & Tennille Railroad v. VaughanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
- Childs v. CharlesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
- Hamilton & Pritchett v. JenkinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bryan v. Rich's, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
- Citizens & Southern National Bank v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
- Dean v. Belk-Gallant Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1965