Legal Opinion

Sanders v. Hairston

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 6, 1988No. 54255PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarkus, J.

The plaintiff-driver and his wife appeal from a judgment on a jury verdict which rejected their injury and consortium claims for an intersection collision. They complain that the court allowed a policeman to recite part of the police report, and that the verdict disregarded the weight of the evidence. These contentions lack merit, so we affirm the trial court’s judgment.

I

The plaintiffs’ car had been proceeding south, and the defendant’s car had been traveling east at approximately 1:00 a.m. Each driver was alone in his car. The roads were snow covered and slippery. The plaintiffs claimed that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Seasons Coal Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  2. C. E. Morris Co. v. Foley Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  3. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Ohio Fast Freight, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1982

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Felden v. Ashland Chemical Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Petti v. PernaOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Muncy v. American Select InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. State v. YorkOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Kerns v. HaleOhio Court of Appeals · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API