Legal Opinion

Finn v. Crystal Beach Transit Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 14, 1977No. Appeal No. 2Published

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: Permission to increase the ad damnum clause in an action for damages for personal injuries lies within the sound discretion of the court (Cox v New York Tel. Co., 10 AD2d 565; cf. Soulier v Harrison, 21 AD2d 725). In determining sound discretion, prejudice to the defendant is a consideration (Boehm v Ekco Prods. Co., 47 AD2d 807; Matter of McNally v Mosbacher, 36 AD2d 522; Ryan v Collins, 33 AD2d 966). Where knowledge is had by defendant of the nature of injuries sustained by plaintiff, delay alone in seeking amendatory ad damnum relief…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Koupash v. Grand Union Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970
  2. Ryan v. CollinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970
  3. Smith v. University of Rochester Medical CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
  4. Natale v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959
  5. Yerdon v. Baldwinsville AcademyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API