Legal Opinion

Business Men's Service Co. v. Obrist

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 12, 1994No. 92C773213; CA A79918PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.

Plaintiff Business Men’s Service Co. filed this action as assignee of Metropolitan Service District (Metro) to collect overdue finance charges that defendant owed to Metro. The trial court entered judgment in favor of plaintiff. We affirm.

We recite the facts in the light most favorable to plaintiff, who prevailed at trial. Williams v. Leatham, 55 Or App 204, 207, 637 P2d 1296 (1981), rev den 292 Or 581 (1982).

Defendant owns an excavation business. In May, 1988, Metro agreed to provide defendant disposal services on a credit basis. The parties’ agreement states:

“Disposal on a credit basis…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Timberline Equipment Co., Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Deerfield Commodities, Ltd. v. Nerco, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  3. Mann v. WetterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  4. Bartlam v. TikkaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  5. Williams v. LeathamCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Peace River Seed Co-Operative, Ltd. v. Proseeds Marketing, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API