Legal Opinion · Dissent

Lertz v. . Hughes Brothers, Inc.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 18, 1935PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1DissentStacy, C. J.

This was a civil action instituted by the plaintiff to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been caused by the negligence of one Joe Campbell, an employee of the defendant corporation, while acting within the scope of his employment. The issues submitted and the answers made thereto were as follows:

"1. Was Joe Campbell, at the time of the collision, acting within the scope of his employment, and in furtherance of his employer's business? Answer: Yes.
"2. Was the plaintiff injured by the negligence of the defendant, as alleged? Answer: Yes.
"3. What damage, if any, is the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sawyer v. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  2. Jeffrey v. . Manufacturing CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  3. Robertson v. Virginia Electric & Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1933

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jackson Ex Rel. Porter v. ScheiberSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  2. Barrow Ex Rel. Barrow v. KeelSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  3. Miller v. . WoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API