Legal Opinion

Coleman v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 31, 1975No. Appeal, 1027PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Price, J.,

This appeal primarily raises the question of the scope of review of an arbitration award made pursuant to a stipulation entered into between the parties. The lower court held that under the stipulation the parties have waived their rights to file exceptions to the award. We agree and will affirm on that ground. Therefore, there *443is no need to set forth the factual background of the accident giving rise to this trespass action.

The entire stipulation follows: “Submission to Arbitration” “AND NOW, this 24th day of September, 1973, JOSEPH J. COLEMAN by his attorney, Herbert…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Allstate Insurance v. FioravantiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Harwitz v. Selas Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  3. Wingate Construction Co. v. Schweizer Dipple, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  4. JA Robbins Co., Inc. v. Airportels, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  5. McCahan v. ReameySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1859

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Keystone InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Sacred Heart Hospital of Norristown v. Independence Blue Cross (In Re Sacred Heart Hospital of Norristown)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
  3. Coleman v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Donovan v. Pennsylvania Blue Shield, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Crawford County1992
  5. Khurshan v. Miah, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API