Legal Opinion

Cohen v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 12, 1976No. 74-3123PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Before BROWNING, WALLACE and SNEED, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

Appellant Lee J. Cohen applied for compensation for services rendered as counsel for the debtor in possession in a Chapter XI proceeding. The referee in bankruptcy denied the application on the ground that no order had been entered appointing appellant as counsel in. accordance with Bankruptcy General Order 44.

Appellant then filed a motion for entry of an order appointing appellant as counsel to the debtor in possession nunc pro tunc, and for reopening of the hearing on appellant’s application for allowance of compensation.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Beecher v. Leavenworth State BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In The Matter Of Laurent Watch Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API