Legal Opinion

Winfree v. Dearth

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 1936No. 8389PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Maxwell, Judge:

This is a suit to establish an express parol trust in real estate in favor of the grantor in a deed. A statute of this state, Code 36-1-4, provides that if a conveyance of land, not fraudulent, is made to one in trust for either the grantor or a third person, such trust may be enforced, though it be not disclosed on the face of the conveyance, nor evidenced by a writing.

The plaintiff, Virgie A. Winfree, was the grantor; and B. H. Dearth, the principal defendant, was the grantee of the property involved. The other defendant, Rose-mond Dearth, is the wife of the principal…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hunt v. HuntWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Baughman v. HoffmanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Fowlkes v. LeaMississippi Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Rymer v. South Penn Oil Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Harraway v. HarrawaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1902

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hoglund v. CurtisWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Boggs v. BoggsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Farrar v. YoungWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Sturm v. CrowleyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Bobbitt v. BobbittWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1947

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API