Legal Opinion

Taggart v. Stanbery

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Ohio

Decided July 15, 1841PublishedCited by 4 opinions

At law.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF

THE COURT.

Henry Graham purchased from the plaintiff, through his agent, Wallace, a certain tract of land, for which he promised to pay six hundred and nineteen dollars, two hundred and twenty one dollars of which were paid the 11th November, 1831. The defendant, Stanbery, purchased Graham’s right, and assumed to pay the balance of the purchase money. In one of his letters to Wallace, as agent of the plaintiff, the defendant stated that the title was involved by -a claim of Samuel Kirkland, who was in possession of the premises, and had been in possession for a number of years; and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. M'Crea v. PurmortCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1836
  2. Wilkinson v. ScottMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1821
  3. Wilson v. TroupCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1823
  4. Bowen v. BellNew York Supreme Court · 1823
  5. Shephard v. LittleNew York Supreme Court · 1817

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rockhill v. SpraggsIndiana Supreme Court · 1857
  2. Schultz v. . GriffinNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  3. Backman v. CharlestownSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1860
  4. Dennis v. Ashley's AdministratorsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1852

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API