Gerlach Live Stock Co. v. Laxalt

ON COSTS

July 31, 1931. The ruling of the clerk is based upon error because the court did make an order as to costs, as in its opinion it said that if the respondents consents to the striking of $1,800 from the judgment of the lower court, the judgment will be affirmed, but on failure so to do the judgment will "be reversed in all things with costs." The only mention of costs in the opinion in this case is the sentence which covers the alternative proposition that upon failure of respondent to accept the modified judgment that the judgment be reversed in all things with costs. I take it that…