Legal Opinion

Pierce v. Newlin

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided December 15, 1904PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff rendered in the Municipal Court of the city of Rew York, twelfth district, borough of Manhattan.

1Opinion of the CourtMacLean, J.

The plaintiff, an attorney-at-law, alleges performance of certain professional services and expenditures rendered and made at the defendant’s special instance and request in the prosecution of two actions against two banks, with appeals in one to the Appellate Division, in the other to the Court of Appeals, the reasonable value of the services at $347.50, the amount of the expenditures and nonpayment. Answering and saying nothing about value of services, amount of expenditures or nonpayment, the defendant, “ 1st. Admits that the defendant employed the plaintiff to bring the two certain…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re the Assignment of SchallerNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1880

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Severance v. BizallionNew York Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Severance v. BizallionAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API