Legal Opinion

Zoulek v. PIP America

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided December 10, 2008No. 2008-CA-0550PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PATRICIA RIVET MURRAY, Judge.

| plaintiffs, Dee and Michael Zoulek, appeal the trial court’s judgment maintaining the exception of peremption filed by defendant, Dr. Randall Weyrich, and dismissing their action. For the reasons that follow, we reverse and remand.

FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS BELOW

On July 25, 2000, Dr. Weyrich performed a breast augmentation procedure upon Dee Zoulek. PIP America [“PIP”] manufactured the saline-filled implants that Dr. Weyrich used in Ms. Zoulek’s procedure. On December 1, 2003, Ms. Zoulek noticed the left breast implant had spontaneously deflated. She then consulted…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Borel v. YoungSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2008
  2. In Re Medical Review Panel, Claim of MosesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2001
  3. Whitnell v. MenvilleSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
  4. Fontenot v. ABC Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1996
  5. In Re Medical Review Panel of HowardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Scott v. ZaheriLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
  2. Ferrara v. Starmed Staffing, LPLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API