Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Perez v. Cognevich

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided April 28, 1924No. 26534Published

1ConcurrenceSt. Paul, J.

I concur in the decree, and also in the opinion, as far as it goes; but there are some things into which the opinion does not go, and into which I think it well to enter.

I

When the case was first under consideration I entertained serious doubts as to the jurisdiction of this court. It is true that the primary law, Act 97 of 1922, section 27, pp. 196, 197, declares that—

“In elections held under the provisions of this act all contests shall be made before the courts of the state, as herein prescribed, which are hereby fully vested with the necessary power, authority, and jurisdiction to hear,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Vidrine v. EldredSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1923
  2. Hart v. PicouSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1920
  3. State ex rel. Ryanes v. GleasonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1904
  4. Payne v. GentrySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1921
  5. Bartmess v. HendricksSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API