Everist v. Department of Labor & Industries
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtReed, J.
The Department of Labor and Industries (Department) appeals from a superior court judgment in favor of Dianna M. Everist, arguing that Everist was a domestic servant and, therefore, excluded from workers' compensation coverage. We agree and reverse.
Dianna M. Everist worked as an in-home helper for Mr. and Mrs. Stewart. The Board of Industrial Insurance Appeals (Board) found the following:
Ms. Everist's duties included giving Mrs. Stewart exercises for about an hour and a half each day; bathing her once a week; feeding her two meals a day and preparing her evening meal; dressing her if she were…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Wilson v. SteinbachWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- Leschi Improvement Council v. Washington State Highway CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1974
- Grant v. SpellmanWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- Jussila v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1962
- McCallister v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Dana's Housekeeping, Inc. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995
- Bennerstrom v. DEPT. OF LABOR & INDUSTRIESCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
- Bennerstrom v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
- ITT Rayonier, Inc. v. DalmanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992
- Davidheiser v. Pierce CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.