Legal Opinion

Everist v. Department of Labor & Industries

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 7, 1990No. 12673-7-IIPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtReed, J.

The Department of Labor and Industries (Department) appeals from a superior court judgment in favor of Dianna M. Everist, arguing that Everist was a domestic servant and, therefore, excluded from workers' compensation coverage. We agree and reverse.

Dianna M. Everist worked as an in-home helper for Mr. and Mrs. Stewart. The Board of Industrial Insurance Appeals (Board) found the following:

Ms. Everist's duties included giving Mrs. Stewart exercises for about an hour and a half each day; bathing her once a week; feeding her two meals a day and preparing her evening meal; dressing her if she were…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wilson v. SteinbachWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Leschi Improvement Council v. Washington State Highway CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Grant v. SpellmanWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Jussila v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  5. McCallister v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Dana's Housekeeping, Inc. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995
  2. Bennerstrom v. DEPT. OF LABOR & INDUSTRIESCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  3. Bennerstrom v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  4. ITT Rayonier, Inc. v. DalmanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992
  5. Davidheiser v. Pierce CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API