Legal Opinion

Nuijens v. Novy

Arcadia Justice Court

Decided July 21, 1989Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Franklin T. Russell, J.

Plaintiff brings this action in Small Claims Court asking for the recovery of the sum of $254.63, alleging that a licensed veterinarian determined that a dog purchased by plaintiff from defendant was unfit for purchase under article 35-B of the General Business Law. The parties presented their testimony and evidence before the Honorable Franklin T. Russell, Town Justice of the Town of Arcadia, on July 14, 1989.

Plaintiff purchased the dog on or about March 1, 1989 for *454the sum of $400. At the time of purchase, defendant, who is self-employed as a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. CPC International Inc. v. McKesson Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Neydavood v. ZorzyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  3. Dempsey v. RosenthalCivil Court of the City of New York · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API