People v. James
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant has not met his "high burden of demonstrating that he was deprived of a fair trial by less than meaningful representation” (People v Hobot, 84 NY2d 1021, 1022). Defendant failed to preserve for our review his contentions that County Court’s Allen charge (see, Allen v United States, 164 US 492, 501-502) was unduly coercive (see, People v White, 166 AD2d 910, lv denied 76 NY2d 992) and that the prosecutor’s improper remarks on summation deprived him of a fair trial (see, People v Chaney, 155 AD2d 985). We decline to exercise our power to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- People v. HobotNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- People v. WhiteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- People v. ChaneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
3Cited by1 opinion
- People v. MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002