Legal Opinion · Dissent

Central Savings & Loan Association v. Gaumer

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 6, 1969No. 53308Published

1DissentLarson, Justice

I respectfully dissent, for the determination by the majority here amounts to little more than an exercise in futility. No gain, only a loss to the litigants, is the ultimate result of this reversal.

The issue presented, as stated by appellants, is whether a judge of the district court could enter a decree on a motion for summary judgment after timely resistance had been made and another judge of that district had overruled the motion. In short, appellants contend the second judge had no jurisdiction to enter a decree in this matter until the prior ruling had been changed pursuant to hearing,…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Palmer v. ChamberlinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1951
  2. Kuiken v. GarrettSupreme Court of Iowa · 1952
  3. De Luca v. Atlantic Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
  4. Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, a Corporation v. Superior Insulating Tape Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1960
  5. American Airlines, Inc. v. Ulen (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1949

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API