Legal Opinion
Oliver Chilled Plow Works v. Dolan
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided April 21, 1905No. Docket No. 163PublishedCited by 1 opinion
Error to Ingham; Wiest, J. Replevin by the Oliver Chilled Plow Works against Patrick H. Dolan. There was judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtCarpenter, J.
In December, 1902, plaintiff and D. J. Mahoney (defendant’s mortgagor), a retail dealer of agricultural implements in the city of Lansing, executed a written agreement, of which the following is a copy:
“Lansing, Dec. 24, 1902.
“ORDER. .
“Oliver Chilled Plow Works,
‘ ‘ South Rend, Ind.
“Please ship on or about the 15th day of February, 1903, *669via. L. S. R. R., sure, from South Bend, the goods below specified.
“This order is given at the discounts named below from current price lists of the Oliver Chilled Plow Works due and payable i May 20, \ Sept. 20, £ Nov. 20, 1903, with 10 per cent, additional…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- First National Bank v. GerkeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1888
- Seymour & Co. v. FarquharSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
- Hunter's Adm'rs v. Miller's ExecutorsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1846
3Cited by1 opinion
- Haxer v. GriesselMichigan Supreme Court · 1910