Estate of Dawson v. Harris Trust & Savings Bank
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Buckley
This dispute presents the question whether a child born and adopted after a trust is executed is intended to be included within the term “child” or “heir-at-law” as used within the language of a trust. The trust in question was executed on January 3, 1928, by Walter H. Eckert (Walter), an attorney. The trust transferred assets to Walter’s wife, Georgia, and himself as trustees. Walter and Georgia had one child, Jane, who was about 17 years of age at the time the trust was executed. No other child was born to or adopted by Walter and Georgia.
The trust provided as follows:
“I. During the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Keegan v. GeraghtyIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
- First National Bank v. Canton Council of Campfire Girls, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1981
- Munie v. GruenewaldIllinois Supreme Court · 1919
- Smith v. ThomasIllinois Supreme Court · 1925
- Harrison v. KampIllinois Supreme Court · 1946
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- St. Mary of Nazareth Hospital v. KuczajAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
- First Nat. Bank of Chicago v. KingIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
- Fischer v. LaFaveAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989
- First Nat. Bank of Chicago v. KingIllinois Supreme Court · 1995