Legal Opinion

Riverside & Dan River Cotton Mills, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided June 3, 1935No. 42090PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAMS, Judge.

The plaintiff seeks to recover $391,402.-47, a duly scheduled overassessment of income and profits taxes for the year 1920, which was credited by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue against a deficiency assessment in a like sum for the year 1918, together with interest. The claim is based on the contention that the additional assessment of $391,402.47, made on November 6, 1926, for the year 1918, was barred by the statute of limitations.

The defense is: (1) That the assessment was timely made under the provisions of a valid waiver; (2) that the plaintiff filed no claim for…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. R. H. Stearns Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Bank of United States v. DandridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
  3. Stange v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  4. Hackley v. HeadleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Mandeville v. . ReynoldsNew York Court of Appeals · 1877

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Shambaugh v. ScofieldCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1942
  2. Tecom, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
  3. John J. Harte Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1950
  4. Graton & Knight Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API