Riverside & Dan River Cotton Mills, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAMS, Judge.
The plaintiff seeks to recover $391,402.-47, a duly scheduled overassessment of income and profits taxes for the year 1920, which was credited by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue against a deficiency assessment in a like sum for the year 1918, together with interest. The claim is based on the contention that the additional assessment of $391,402.47, made on November 6, 1926, for the year 1918, was barred by the statute of limitations.
The defense is: (1) That the assessment was timely made under the provisions of a valid waiver; (2) that the plaintiff filed no claim for…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- R. H. Stearns Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Bank of United States v. DandridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
- Stange v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Hackley v. HeadleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
- Mandeville v. . ReynoldsNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Shambaugh v. ScofieldCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1942
- Tecom, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- John J. Harte Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1950
- Graton & Knight Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1937