Legal Opinion
Hartman v. Summers
District Court, C.D. California
Decided March 30, 1995No. CV94-0101-IH(AJW)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
IRVING HILL, District Judge.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has reviewed the petition, all of the records and files in this action, the attached Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, and the objections to the Report and Recommendation. The Court concurs with and adopts the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge after having made a de novo determination of the portions to which objections were directed. 1
IT IS ORDERED that the petition…
2Cases cited64 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Reiter v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2001
- Green v. Commissioner of Mental Health & Mental RetardationSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
- Douglas M. HARTMAN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. William L. SUMMERS, Respondent-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- State v. MillerHawaii Supreme Court · 1997
- Francis S. v. StoneDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.