Legal Opinion
United States v. Riggs National Bank
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided April 30, 1986No. Civ. A. 84-2889PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
FLANNERY, Senior District Judge.
This matter comes before the court on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. Oral argument was heard on April 4, 1986. For the reasons set forth below, the government’s motion is granted and defendant Riggs National Bank’s motion is denied.
I. Background
In her last will and testament, Isabel G. Zantzinger established a trust fund. By the terms of the fund, her three children were entitled to distributions of income generated by the trust fund during their lifetimes and her grandchildren were entitled to distributions of both income and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Aquilino v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Nichols v. EatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Watterson v. EdgerlyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1978
- United States v. TaylorDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1966
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bank One Ohio Trust Company, N.A., as Trustee of the Albin C. Reitelbach Trust v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Bank One Ohio Trust Co., N.A. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1994
- M & T Electrical Contractors, Inc. v. Capital Lighting & Supply, Inc. (In Re M & T Electrical Contractors, Inc.)District Court, District of Columbia · 2001
- United States v. GrimmDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1994