Legal Opinion
Trub v. Braunstein
New York Supreme Court
Decided September 8, 1958Published
1Opinion of the CourtDonald S. Taylor, J.
The motion is to punish the defendant Dominger and his attorneys for contempt of court for their failure to comply with the provisions of an order of this court which reads as follows :
“ Obdebed that the defendant Anthony Dominger, and his attorneys, Block & Greene, Esqs., of 271 North Avenue, New Rochelle, New York, be, and they hereby are, severally directed to pay to Goldstein & Goldstein, Esqs., as attorneys for the plaintiffs, Sol Trub and Isidore Ashendorff, within five days after service upon them of a copy of this order with notice of entry, the sum of $500 to be applied on account of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bachman v. . HarringtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
- People Ex Rel. Cauffman v. . Van BurenNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- People Ex Rel. Lower v. . DonovanNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Hennig v. AbrahamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
- Hennig v. AbrahamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.