Legal Opinion

In Re Disciplinary Action Against Ward

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 25, 2007No. A06-1992PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER. The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility has filed a petition for disciplinary action alleging that respondent Thomas Robert Ward has committed professional misconduct warranting public discipline, namely: (1) entering into a business transaction with a client that was not fair and reasonable, failing to fully disclose all of the terms of the transaction to the client in a manner that could be reasonably understood by the client, failing to obtain from the client a consent to the transaction in a document separate from the transaction documents, failing to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re Disciplinary Action Against SwerineSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
  2. In Re Disciplinary Action Against DavisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re Reinstatement to the Practice of Law of WardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  2. In re Reinstatement to the Practice of Law of WardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API