Shields v. Reddo
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
432 Mich. 761 (1989)
443 N.W.2d 145
SHIELDS
v.
REDDO
Docket No. 81575, (Calendar No. 6).
Supreme Court of Michigan.
Argued November 1, 1988.
Decided July 24, 1989.
Bushnell, Gage & Reizen (by Scott D. Moore) for the plaintiff.
Holahan, Malloy, Maybaugh & Monnich (by J. Michael Malloy, III); (Plunkett & Cooney, P.C., by John P. Jacobs and Ernest R. Bazzana, of counsel) for the defendants.
GRIFFIN, J.
In this dramshop action,[1] we are required to decide whether the deposition given by a former employee of the defendant bar owner was admissible as evidence at trial, despite the rule against hearsay, where…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Ruhala v. RobyMichigan Supreme Court · 1967
- Socha v. PassinoMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
- Fleegar v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1933
- Chapman v. BuderMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
- Kalamazoo Yellow Cab Co. v. Kalamazoo Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.