Legal Opinion

Shields v. Reddo

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 24, 1989No. 81575, (Calendar No. 6)Published

1Opinion of the Court

432 Mich. 761 (1989)

443 N.W.2d 145

SHIELDS

v.

REDDO

Docket No. 81575, (Calendar No. 6).

Supreme Court of Michigan.

Argued November 1, 1988.

Decided July 24, 1989.

Bushnell, Gage & Reizen (by Scott D. Moore) for the plaintiff.

Holahan, Malloy, Maybaugh & Monnich (by J. Michael Malloy, III); (Plunkett & Cooney, P.C., by John P. Jacobs and Ernest R. Bazzana, of counsel) for the defendants.

GRIFFIN, J.

In this dramshop action,[1] we are required to decide whether the deposition given by a former employee of the defendant bar owner was admissible as evidence at trial, despite the rule against hearsay, where…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Ruhala v. RobyMichigan Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Socha v. PassinoMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Fleegar v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Chapman v. BuderMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
  5. Kalamazoo Yellow Cab Co. v. Kalamazoo Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1961

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API