Legal Opinion

Celli v. Santos

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 25, 1995No. 92-2816-L-1(4); CA A83889PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLeeson, J.

In this personal injury case, defendant Braun appeals from a judgment for plaintiff. She assigns error to the trial court’s denial of her motion for a directed verdict. We consider the evidence in the light most favorable to plaintiff and, because we cannot say that there is no evidence to support the jury’s verdict, we affirm. Or Const, Art VII (Amended), § 3; Brown v. J. C. Penney Co., 297 Or 695, 705, 688 P2d 811 (1984); Sivers v. R & F Capital Corp., 123 Or App 35, 37, 858 P2d 895 (1993), rev den 318 Or 351 (1994).

Plaintiff was a passenger in an automobile driven by her mother, defendant…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Brown v. J. C. Penney Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Valdin v. HolteenOregon Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Morey, Administratrix v. REDIFEROregon Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Bockman v. Mitchell Bros. Truck LinesOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Osborne v. BessonetteOregon Supreme Court · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bruneau v. CurtisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  2. Luna v. LunaCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API