Legal Opinion

Greenwood v. Ledford

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 23, 1932No. 22520PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The first question for determination is •whether the bill of exceptions should be dismissed on motion of counsel for defendants in error for the reason that the only assignment of error is insufficient in law.

It appears from the bill of exceptions (which contains the evidence in the case) that J. J. Greenwood, plaintiff in error, and Blanche Ledford and Myrtice Starr, defendants in error, claimed the proceeds of a certain fire-insurance policy; that the money due on the policy was paid into court by the insurer; that the case was submitted to the court without the intervention of a jury; that…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  2. Marshall v. English-American Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  3. Mutual Building & Loan Ass'n v. GlessnerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896
  4. Kaufman v. CaughmanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1897
  5. Hall v. HuffSupreme Court of Georgia · 1885

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ulmer v. UlmerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  2. Wood v. Fairfax Loan & Investment Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
  3. Titshaw v. RushtonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API