Legal Opinion

Smithtown General Hospital v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 17, 1996PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*577The plaintiff Smithtown General Hospital (hereinafter Smithtown General) was the assignee of 38 no-fault insurance claims against the defendant, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (hereinafter State Farm). At issue on the present appeal is whether the plaintiff Joseph Henig, P. C. (hereinafter Henig), Smithtown General’s counsel, is entitled to recover attorney’s fees from State Farm for its prosecution of a prior appeal in which this Court held that the Supreme Court had improperly determined the amount of interest and attorney’s fees for which State Farm was responsible to the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hempstead General Hospital v. Allstate General InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  2. Hempstead General Hospital v. Allstate InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Smithtown General Hospital v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  4. Hempstead General Hospital v. National Grange Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Tomo v. Episcopal Health Services, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  2. Tomo v. Episcopal Health Services, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API