Legal Opinion

Christenson v. Wikan

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 1948PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWickhem, J.

Plaintiffs are the owners of lot 5, and the north 8 feet of lot 6, in block 1, Chapman & Thorp’s fourth addition to the city of Eau Claire. Defendants are the owners of the balance of lot 6 which lies immediately to the south of plaintiffs’ property. Both properties face east on Graham avenue which runs north and south. There is a north and south curb running from the street to the sidewalk and forming a driveway entrance. This curb extends to the sidewalk and from there on west the driveway is uninclosed. At the street the distance between the curbs is about fifteen feet. The distance from…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Carmody v. MulrooneyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Shepard v. GilbertWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Bassett v. SoelleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Martin v. MeyerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1942

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Shellow v. HagenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Carlson v. CraigWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Bino v. City of HurleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Opinion No. Oag 74-76, (1976), Wisconsin Attorney General Reports1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API