Legal Opinion

Crim v. Rhinehart

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1908Published

Error to Circuit Court, Barbour County. Proceeding to revive a judgment by E. H. Crim and another, as executors, against M. T. Rhinehart and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiffs bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

BraNNON, Judge:

Upon a justice’s judgment in favor of J. H. Felton and J. N. B. Crim against M. P. Rhinehart and three others, Crim having died, the justice gave written notice to the defendants to show cause why the judgment should not be re*442vived and execution issued in favor of E. H. Grim and Melville Peck, executors of J. N. B. Grim. Felton was not a party to the notice. He asked no revival. Appearance was made in both courts specially only for a motion to quash the notice. The justice revived the judgment according to the notice; but on appeal to the circuit court the court granted a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Holt v. LynchWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1881
  2. State v. LambertWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Phillips v. DevenyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API