Walbridge v. Little
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 181, Jan. T., 1921, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. Bradford Co., Dec. T., 1915, No. 232, on verdict for plaintiff, in case of James W. Walbridge v. William Little, Admr. c. t. a. of estate of Daniel G. Bailey, deceased. Assumpsit for services. Before Maxwell, P. J. The statement of claim is as follows: “The plaintiff in this suit complains of the defendant in this suit who has been summoned to answer the plaintiff in a plea of assumpsit.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 181, Jan. T., 1921, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. Bradford Co., Dec. T., 1915, No. 232, on verdict for plaintiff, in case of James W. Walbridge v. William Little, Admr. c. t. a. of estate of Daniel G. Bailey, deceased. Assumpsit for services. Before Maxwell, P. J. The statement of claim is as follows: “The plaintiff in this suit complains of the defendant in this suit who has been summoned to answer the plaintiff in a plea of assumpsit. “For that whereas the said defendant heretofore, to wit, on the 20th day of June, A. D. 1888, by writing signed, sealed and delivered, a…
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Schaffer,
Daniel G. Bailey, a man of grossly intemperate habits, had been found to be an habitual drunkard, and a committee was appointed for him; the committee, however, had been discharged and his property returned to him about a year before the date of the paper which appears in the Reporter’s summary, and which will be referred to herein as a deed of trust. Between its date, June 20, 1888, and Bailey’s death in November, 1913, so far as the testimony discloses, no one knew of the existence of this paper. Two years following his decease, plaintiff brought suit against…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Bean's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919