Legal Opinion

Dickens v. Irvin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 28, 1995PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment insofar as appealed from unanimously reversed on the law without costs and petition dismissed. Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in directing respondents to expunge from their institutional records any reference to an alleged escape attempt by petitioner while in local custody in 1992 (see, Matter of Sommer v Jones, 96 AD2d 624, lv denied 60 NY2d 555). Respondents have the authority and duty to indicate on their records whether an inmate is a security risk because of a prior history of escape or attempted escape (see, Correction Law § 137 [1], [2]; § 601 [a]). If the inmate believes…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sommer v. JonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pickett v. LongAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  2. Kalwasinski v. FischerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  3. Epps v. BroaddusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  4. Delgado v. ArtusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API