Legal Opinion
George v. Ospalik
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided September 14, 1998No. 3-97-0967PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Homer
The appellants, plaintiffs in a personal injury and property damage action, contend that the trial court erred when it refused to grant their motion to voluntarily dismiss and when it entered judgment on an arbitration award sua sponte in favor of the defendant.
FACTS
The plaintiffs, Carol and Ronald George, filed a personal injury and property damage action against the defendant, Ronald Ospalik, as the result of an automobile accident in Will County.
A mandatory arbitration hearing was held on September 11, 1997. The hearing was attended by the parties and their attorneys. The arbitrators ruled…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Catlett v. NovakIllinois Supreme Court · 1987
- Arnett v. YoungAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
- Lollis v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
- Perez v. LeibowitzAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
- Rosengard v. McDonaldAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
3Cited by9 opinions
- Illinois Bell Telephone Co. v. Illinois Commerce CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
- Liebovich Steel & Aluminum Co. v. Advance Iron Works, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2004
- Jones v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2018
- Walker v. LewisAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
- Illinois Bell Telephone Co. v. Illinois Commerce Comm'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.