Legal Opinion
Hearst Corp. v. Director of Revenue
Supreme Court of Missouri
Decided November 14, 1989No. 71620Published
1Opinion of the Court
779 S.W.2d 557 (1989)
The HEARST CORPORATION, Appellant,
v.
DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, Respondent.
No. 71620.
Supreme Court of Missouri, En Banc.
November 14, 1989.
I. Edward Marquette, Michael J. Wilczynski, Kansas City, Mo., for appellant.
Harry D. Williams, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Duane Benton, Director of Revenue, William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Richard L. Wieler, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, Mo., for respondent.
BILLINGS, Justice.
The narrow issue in this case is limited to taxes paid by Hearst Corporation in connection with the sale of various magazines to Missouri subscribers. Hearst contends that…
Also in this document: Dissent · Blackmar; Dissent · Blackmar.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Minneapolis Star & Tribune Co. v. Minnesota Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Arkansas Writers' Project, Inc. v. RaglandSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- State Ex Rel. Williams v. MarshSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
- State Ex Rel. State Board of Mediation v. PiggSupreme Court of Missouri · 1951
- Daily Record Co. v. JamesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.