Legal Opinion
District of Columbia v. Samuel Sussman, District of Columbia v. Arthur Investment Co., Inc.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided July 26, 1965No. 18276_1PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McGOWAN, Circuit Judge:
These two cases present the same issue. It is this: When the Federal Government takes possession of real estate in the District of Columbia, may the condemnation court prorate the prior owner’s liability to the District for real estate taxes assessed the preceding July 1, with the effect of relieving the property of such taxation for that part of the year succeeding the seizure? We say no. In allowing the District Government’s appeals to reverse the District Court, we do not, however, see the issue in quite the same light as it has been presented to us by the parties.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. City of DetroitSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- District of Columbia v. John R. Thompson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
- United States v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Moses Lake Homes, Inc. v. Grant CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United States v. 150.29 Acres of Land, More or Less, in Milwaukee CountyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1943
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- City of East Orange v. PalmerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1966
- District of Columbia Redevelopment Land Agency v. Eleven Parcels of Land In Squares 2662, 2665, 2666, 2670, 2674, 2837, 2849, 2860, 2866Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
- TP. OF SPRINGFIELD v. Union Cty. Park Comm.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
- Township of Springfield v. Union County Park CommissionNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
- District of Columbia v. Samuel Sussman, District of Columbia v. Arthur Investment Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.