In the Interest of J.O.
Court of Appeals of Iowa
1DissentSackett, C.J.
The majority concludes “[i]t is unnecessary to interpret the distinction between physical and legal custody because in this context they are identical,” and “[n]o amount of contact with the child rises to the level of physical or legal custody without a judicial determination.... ” I must disagree because I believe the majority misapplies the statute by failing to examine the language chosen by our legislature.
The record shows that the legal custody of Jaden was placed with Leah in April of 2002. The issue is whether Jaden’s “physical” custody was removed from April for the required period…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Vivian v. MadisonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1999
- Top of Iowa Cooperative v. Sime Farms, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2000
- Marcus v. YoungSupreme Court of Iowa · 1995
- State v. HatterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1987
- Farmers Cooperative Co. v. DeCosterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1995
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.