Legal Opinion
Rohrer v. Kane
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided February 21, 1980No. 79CA0658PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, Judge.
Respondent, Arthur Kane, seeks to vacate an order of the Denver District Court entered in a Reciprocal Enforcement of Support action requiring him to pay $250 per month for child support. He asserts, inter alia, that under the Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act (URESA), child support cannot be ordered in a greater amount than that ordered by the court which dissolved the marriage. We disagree.
In 1971 the marriage between petitioner, Harriet Rohrer, and respondent Kane was dissolved by a California court. At that time respondent Kane was ordered to pay $100 per month…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Olson v. OlsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
- Berge v. BergeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1975
- Vigil v. VigilColorado Court of Appeals · 1972
3Cited by6 opinions
- Commonwealth of Virginia v. AutryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
- Helmick v. HelmickDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
- Koon v. Boulder Cty., Dept. of Soc. Serv.Supreme Court of Florida · 1986
- State of Ga. v. McKennaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1984
- People v. KaneSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.