C.T. v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
The adjudication of delinquency under review is affirmed based on the following holdings: (1) the trial court, as the trier of fact, was not required to find, as urged, that the juvenile requested counsel 'prior to his confession to the police because the juvenile’s testimony below on this subject, which admittedly is unrefuted, does not establish this fact (Tr. 14), Von Horn v. State, 334 So.2d 43, 46 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976), cert. denied, 341 So.2d 1086 (Fla.1977); (2) as we have held in another opinion filed this day and involving the same issue, there is, in our view, no requirement that a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Michigan v. MosleySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Jordan v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1976
- Von Horn v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
- S.L.W. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. In the Interest of D.L.B.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985